MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113698235 · doi:10.1353/ltr.2020.0023

Precarious Forms: Performing Utopia in the Neoliberal Americas by Candice Amich

2020· article· en· W3113698235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
César Barros A.

Bibliographic record

VenueLatin American theatre review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnarchism and Radical Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUtopiaNeoliberalism (international relations)PrecarityPrecarious workAestheticsSociologyPoliticsAgency (philosophy)Gender studiesArtPolitical scienceArt historyPolitical economySocial scienceLawWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Precarious Forms: Performing Utopia in the Neoliberal Americas by Candice Amich César Barros A. Amich, Candice. Precarious Forms: Performing Utopia in the Neoliberal Americas, Northwestern UP, 2020. 232 pp. What forms of resistance can artistic practices, poetry, and performance art, in particular, stage within a space swallowed by neoliberal governance—a global system that creates exploitative and precarious forms of work and sociability and that hinders collective organization and political transformation? This is one of the main questions that Candice Amich attempts to tackle in Precarious Forms: Performing Utopia in the Neoliberal Americas. The book sets out to analyze an important body of work from consecrated artists across the Americas, ranging from Canadian-based poet Dionne Brand to multifaceted Chilean artist Cecilia Vicuña. Amich uses 'utopia' as the main conceptual tool to understand how these artists, the majority of whom are women, confront neoliberal precarious contexts. Their strategies, Amich contends, do not stage other possible worlds directly (in the more affirmative sense we tend to give classic forms of utopia) but rather, through an Adornian turn, affirm the negation of the "neoliberal sensorium," thus staging the blatant contradictions and tensions in the ways of life determined by neoliberalism. These works respond to precarity by creating forms that, through the affirmation of a negation, point to the possibility of transforming the base structure of neoliberal realities across the continent. This utopian wager can take the form of "utopian longing" (Nancy Morejón and Brand), "precarious forms of bonding" (Ana Mendieta and Coco Fusco), or "state ritual violence," as Amich proposes in the case of Regina José Galindo's performances. With this book, Amich has created a fruitful space for dialogue among practices from different artists during different periods of the neoliberal historical sequence. The book will appeal to those interested in performance art and poetry and in the relation between artistic practices and pressing issues such as migration, exile, precarious forms of labor, and post-revolutionary and post-dictatorship struggles for justice and visibilization. Her close readings are illuminating and some of them offer novel ways of entering or re-entering classic works. Among these is the reading of Fusco and [End Page 151] Domínguez's Dolores from 10 to 22, in which Amich dives into the tensions within the neoliberal gaze. The crossing of this work with performative strategies of the Zapatistas is revealing, as is the insertion of Debordian ideas to develop these arguments, if at times the author over-emphasizes the "staging" strategies of the Mexican revolutionary movement over other important facets. One also wonders if Amich's utopian wager can be so seamlessly applied to indigenous world-making practices. One of the most illuminating parts of the book is her reflection on testimonio as a way of entering Galindo's work. Precarious Forms creates productive dialogues among artistic practices that imagine paths of resistance during these unjust, carceral, and deadly times. Some chapters would benefit from a clearer characterization of the realities they confront. For instance, the critique of masculinist revolutionary narratives that Brand, Morejón and Daisy Zamora react to in their works, a critique central in Amich's reading, could have been developed in more detail. The same could be said of the very interesting point of the neoliberal individualization of subjectivities—how does this come to be and to what ends are these processes of subjectification deployed? The breadth and scope of the book is nonetheless impressive and Precarious Forms is a novel contribution to a corpus of critical works that center utopia in the struggle against neoliberalism. César Barros A. SUNY New Paltz Copyright © 2020 The Center of Latin American Studies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLatin American theatre reviewSame topicAnarchism and Radical PoliticsFrench-language works237,207