Long-term functional outcomes of diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee after synovectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) of the knee is a rare benign disease that has a destructive clinical course. Reported treatment options include arthroscopic or open synovectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy of various doses. This study compared the long-term functional outcomes and disease control among treatment modalities and discussed 22 years of experience with radiotherapy (RT) as an adjuvant treatment for PVNS of knee.Methods A single-center database was searched for patients who received synovectomy of knee with the pathologic diagnosis of PVNS. General data, treatment modalities, and recurrent status were retrospectively collected from medical records. Functional outcomes were evaluated by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) through phone interviews by an independent orthopedist.Results From January 1995 to December 2017, 24 patients with diffuse PVNS of knee were identified, including 19 receiving open synovectomy (OP) and 5 undergoing arthroscopic surgery (AS). Adjuvant RT was performed on 14 patients with a median dose of 34.25 Gy (range 20-40 Gy). After median follow up of 6 years, clinically or radiographically confirmed recurrences were recorded in 10 cases. The local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the OP+RT group than the OP group (8.3% vs. 57.1%, p =0.038). Among those with preserved knee joints, there was no significant difference in the WOMAC score and stiffness score between patients in the OP+RT and OP groups.Conclusions In conclusion, for patients with diffuse PVNS of knee, the addition of moderate-dose adjuvant RT to open synovectomy provided excellent local control while maintaining good joint function with limited treatment-related morbidity. Our study emphasized the importance of moderate dose of RT in diffuse PVNS of knee joint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".