MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113721125 · doi:10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100125

Multistate resistive switching behaviors for neuromorphic computing in memristor

2020· article· en· W3113721125 on OpenAlexafffund
Bai Sun, Shubham Ranjan, Guangdong Zhou, Tao Guo, Yudong Xia, Lan Wei, Y. Zhou, Yimin A. Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Today Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringMemristorVon Neumann architectureUnconventional computingComputer scienceResistive random-access memoryDNA computingResistive touchscreenIn-Memory ProcessingComputer architectureComputationArtificial neural networkElectronic engineeringDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmElectrical engineeringVoltageEngineeringSearch engine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional Von Neumann computing systems encounter increasing challenges in the big-data era due to the constraints by the separated data storage and processing. Resistive random-access memory provides dual functionalities of data storage and computing at the same position without data transmission. This is one of the most promising candidates for energy efficient neuromorphic computing. The key points to realize neuromorphic computing are the selection of functional materials, the design of multistate devices, and a complete logic function implementing in-memory computing. Here, we demonstrate a memristor device, formed by Al/TiO2–few-layer Graphene–DNA/Pt layers, with stable intermediate multistate resistive switching behaviors. Asynchronous conduction by either oxygen vacancies migration or injected electron transfer is responsible for the multistate resistive switching behaviors. For neuromorphic computing, a pixel data stored and 2-bit parallel logic computations are simulated based on the multistate resistive switching behaviors. Compared with traditional memristor devices, this device can achieve theoretically double the data storage. This work provides a new horizon on the memristive memory and the complete logic hardware.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations83
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Today AdvancesSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207