Smart Glove and Hand Gesture-Based Control Interface for Multi-Rotor Aerial Vehicles in a Multi-Subject Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces an adaptable, human-computer interaction method to control multi-rotor aerial vehicles in unsupervised, multi-subject environments. A region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN) first detects subjects in a frame and their faces' regions of interest (RoIs), which are then fed to a facial recognition module to search for the main subject within the frame. The R-CNN model supplies the right-hand RoI of the main subject to a convolutional neural network (CNN) that classifies the right-hand gesture. A motion processing unit (MPU) and four flex sensors are embedded in the left hand's smart glove to produce discrete and continuous signals. Those signals are generated based on the bending of left-hand fingers and the left hand's roll angle and then fed to a support vector machine (SVM) to classify the left-hand gesture. Three validation layers have been implemented, including a human-based validation, classification validation, and the system validation. The comprehensive experimental results have validated the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".