Ultimate Strength of Nanotwinned Face-Centered Cubic Metals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we present a theoretical model to predict the ultimate strength of nanotwinned face-centered cubic (fcc) metals based on the activation energy for phase transformation (i.e., between the matrix and the twinned counterpart) mediated by the migration of {112}-type step on Σ3(111) twin boundaries. By integrating the Hall-Petch strengthening and grain boundary sliding into this model, we can accurately predict the strength of four representative nanotwinned (nt) fcc metals (nt-Cu, nt-Ag, nt-Ni, and nt-Al) within a broad range of grain sizes including the so-called nanocrystalline-nanotwinned regime. This framework is built on material parameters which directly connect the theoretical calculations with experimental measurements and reveals new insights into the design of ultrastrong metals and alloys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it