MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113905995 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.14574

A Differentially Private Multi-Output Deep Generative Networks Approach For Activity Diary Synthesis

2020· preprint· en· W3113905995 on OpenAlexaff
Godwin Badu-Marfo, Bilal Farooq, Zachary Patterson

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPairwise comparisonDifferential privacyComputer scienceGenerative grammarGenerative modelGeneralizationPopulationArtificial intelligenceAdversarial systemMachine learningData miningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we develop a privacy-by-design generative model for synthesizing the activity diary of the travel population using state-of-art deep learning approaches. This proposed approach extends literature on population synthesis by contributing novel deep learning to the development and application of synthetic travel data while guaranteeing privacy protection for members of the sample population on which the synthetic populations are based. First, we show a complete de-generalization of activity diaries to simulate the socioeconomic features and longitudinal sequences of geographically and temporally explicit activities. Second, we introduce a differential privacy approach to control the level of resolution disclosing the uniqueness of survey participants. Finally, we experiment using the Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). We evaluate the statistical distributions, pairwise correlations and measure the level of privacy guaranteed on simulated datasets for varying noise. The results of the model show successes in simulating activity diaries composed of multiple outputs including structured socio-economic features and sequential tour activities in a differentially private manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.112 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207