MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113963965 · doi:10.32396/usurj.v6i3.498

En lisant le Télémaque

2020· article· fr· W3113963965 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Joshua L. M. Brand

Bibliographic record

VenueUSURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si certaines œuvres balzaciennes trahissent l’influence de l’esthétisme romantique, qu’il soit intime ou romanesque, ainsi dans Le Lys dans la vallée (1835), Balzac a aussi saisi les limites des romantiques et s’est tourné vers le roman réaliste. Devenant finalement le père du mouvement réaliste français, il a su créer une écriture renommée pour l’observation détaillée des milieux sociaux. Dans cet article, je me penche sur le roman moins connu de Balzac, Une fille d’Ève (1838), qui représente un angle du réalisme en abordant la problématique de la tension entre les femmes et les hommes. Mon analyse vise à faire ressortir le fait que cette tension qui a inspiré Balzac provient sans doute de la méthode Jacotot liée au roman Les Aventures de Télémaque de Fénelon. Le présent article propose d’explorer cette relation philosophique en partant des références et des pratiques intertextuelles du roman de Balzac, deux caractéristiques essentielles de l’écriture balzacienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.017
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research JournalSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207