MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of pressure on the pseudogap and charge density wave phases of the cuprate Nd-LSCO probed by thermopower measurements

2021· article· en· W3113999302 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMaterials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard UniversityDivision of Materials ResearchCanada First Research Excellence FundHigh Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of SciencesCanada Foundation for InnovationFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNational High Magnetic Field LaboratoryCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchGordon and Betty Moore FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPseudogapSeebeck coefficientSuperconductivityHydrostatic pressureCuprateCharge density waveElectrical resistivity and conductivityPhase (matter)Density of states

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report thermopower measurements under hydrostatic pressure on the cuprate superconductor La 1.6-x Nd 0.4 Sr x CuO 4 (Nd-LSCO), at low temperature in the normal state accessed by suppressing superconductivity with a magnetic field up to H = 31 T. Using an ac thermopower measurement technique suitable for high pressure and high field, we track the pressure evolution of the Seebeck coefficient S. At ambient pressure and low temperature, S/T in Nd-LSCO was recently found to suddenly increase below the pseudogap critical doping p = 0.23, consistent with a drop in carrier density n from n = 1 + p above p to n = p below. Under a pressure of 2.0 GPa, we observe that the large S/T value just below p is suppressed. This confirms a previous pressure study based on electrical resistivity and Hall effect, which found that pressure lowers p , thereby reinforcing the interpretation that this effect is driven by the pressure-induced shift of the van Hove point. It implies that the pseudogap only exists when the Fermi surface is hole-like, which puts strong constraints on theories of the pseudogap phase. We also report thermopower measurements on Nd-LSCO and La 1.8-x Eu 0.2 Sr x CuO 4 in the charge density wave phase near p 1/8, which reveals a weakening of this phase under pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207