One‐dimensional consolidation of layered soils under ramp load based on continuous drainage boundary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The traditional drainage boundary regards the drainage boundary as completely permeable or completely impervious. However, the drainage boundary is an impeded drainage boundary between completely permeable and impervious in engineering practice. In view of this, a new drainage boundary, namely the continuous drainage boundary, is introduced in this paper to study the consolidation problem of layered soils. First, the governing equations for the one‐dimensional consolidation problem of layered soils subjected to a ramp load are established. Then, the analytical solution of excess pore water pressure and average consolidation degree is derived by means of Laplace transform and matrix transfer method. The present solution is verified by degenerating it and comparing with existing solutions. Based on the present solution, the consolidation behavior of the layered soils is investigated by conducting a detailed parametric study. The results show that, both the interface parameters of boundaries and the stratification of the layered soils can heavily affect the distribution of the excess pore water pressure along the depth, thereby influence the plane of the maximum excess pore water pressure. Therefore, the interface parameters of boundaries and the soil stratification should be comprehensively considered in the optimization for the horizontal drains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".