Time Difference of Arrival Estimation Based on a Kronecker Product Decomposition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time difference of arrival (TDOA) estimation, which often serves as the fundamental step for a source localization or a beamforming system, has a significant practical importance in a wide spectrum of applications. To deal with reverberation, the TDOA estimation problem is often transformed into one of identifying the relative acoustic impulse responses. This letter presents a method to efficiently identify the relative acoustic impulse response between two microphones for TDOA estimation based on the so-called Kronecker product decomposition. By decomposing the relative impulse response into a series of Kronecker products of shorter filters, the original channel identification problem with a long impulse response is converted into one of identifying a number of short filters. Since the TDOA information is embedded only in the direct path of the relative impulse response, the dimension of the Kronecker product decomposition can be very small and, as a result, the developed algorithm is expected to work well in real environments with a small number of data snapshots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it