The Best of All Worlds: Improving Predictability at the Performance of Conventional Coherence with No Protocol Modifications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tasks in modern embedded systems such as automotive and avionics communicate among each other using shared data towards achieving the desired functionality of the whole system. In commodity platforms, cores communicate data through the shared memory hierarchy and correctness is maintained by a cache coherence protocol. Recent works investigated the deployment of coherence protocols in real-time systems and showed significant performance improvements. Nonetheless, we find these works to suffer from two main drawbacks. 1) They suffer from significant latency delays due to coherence interference. 2) They require amendments to existing coherence protocols. This represents a significant obstruction hindering the industry adoption of these proposals since it requires to re-verify the coherence protocol. Coherence verification is considered one of the most complex challenges in computer architecture, which makes it inconceivable for chip manufacturers to adopt modifications to their already verified protocols that they have stable for decades.In this work, we propose PISCOT: a predictable and coherent bus architecture that (i) provides a considerably tighter bound compared to the state-of-the-art predictable coherent solutions (4× tighter bounds in a quad-core system). (ii) It does so with a negligible performance loss compared to conventional high-performance architecture coherence delays (less than 4% for SPLASH-3 benchmarks). This improves average performance by up to 5× (2.8× on average) compared to its predictable coherence counterpart. Finally, (iii) it achieves that without requiring any modifications to conventional coherence protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".