MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A 0.8 -3.4 GHz, Low-Power and Low-noise RF-to-BB-Current-Reuse Receiver Front-End for Wideband Local and Wide-area IoT Applications

2020· article· en· W3114306279 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Abbasi, Nakisa Shams, Frédéric Nabki

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocal oscillatorElectrical engineeringWidebandNoise figureRF front endAmplifierLow-noise amplifierTransimpedance amplifierBasebandRadio receiver designElectronic engineeringRadio frequencyCMOSIntermediate frequencyComputer scienceRF power amplifierEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)Transmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low-noise, low-power and wideband RF-to-baseband (BB)-current-reuse quadrature (I/Q) receiver frontend using an active-inductor (AI) technique is proposed to support several local and wide-area wireless standards from 0.8 GHz to 3.4 GHz. To achieve low-power, a single supply and de bias current are shared between a low-noise transconductance amplifier (LNTA) and a transimpedance amplifier (TIA). A double-balanced current driven passive mixer with a 25% duty-cycle local oscillator (LO) to enhance the overall performance are used. To improve the gain and noise performance of the receiver, a high impedance AI is employed to isolate the RF signal path from the output node and BB signal that allows the receiver to operate at higher frequencies with minimum degradation. A g <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">m</sub> -boosted capacitive cross-coupled common-gate (CCC-CG) LNTA topology is employed to enhance input-matching, gain and NF without consuming extra power. The proposed receiver is implemented in 130-nm TSMC CMOS process and occupies an active area of 0.025 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> . In the default current setting, at an 4 MHz intermediate-frequency (IF) and a 2.4 GHz radiofrequency (RF), it achieves a voltage gain of 39.5 dB, a double-sideband (DSB) noise figure (NF) of 2.6 dB, S <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sub> of less than -15dB and an IIP3 of -28dBm while consuming 1.6mA from 1.2 V supply voltage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207