MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114310941 · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100097

When the gigs are gone: Valuing arts, culture and media in the COVID-19 pandemic

2020· article· en· W3114310941 on OpenAlexaff
M. Sharon Jeannotte

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Sciences & Humanities Open · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsInstitute on GovernanceUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)The artsSustainabilityValue (mathematics)Social mediaPublic relationsCreative economyPolitical science2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSociologyCreativityMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated health care systems and economies around the world, but at the same time it has focused attention as never before on the cultural sector and on the role of digital technologies in disseminating content to locked-down, stressed-out and bored populations. This article proposes a four-part conceptual framework that uses economic, social, creative, and sustainability lenses to examine the immediate impact of the pandemic on creators, curators and the media. After reviewing a sample of policy and creative responses to these challenges, it discusses the possible implications for how governments and citizens value the creative sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.409
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.013 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Sciences & Humanities OpenSame topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207