MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114311377 · doi:10.1142/s1793962321300016

Computationally aware systems: Recommended features through a review of 188 definitions and its relevance to advanced simulation

2020· review· en· W3114311377 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Irani, Pouria Sharifian Monfared, Mohammad Kazemifard, Tuncer Ören

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Complex Systems · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelevance (law)Computer scienceConsciousnessComputationCognitionData scienceCognitive scienceManagement scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyNeuroscienceAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, 188 definitions of aware, awareness, conscious, and consciousness, classified in different categories including cognitive science, computation, medicine, neurology, and philosophy, are reviewed. Based on this systematic review, desirable features of computationally aware systems (CASs) are gleaned and reported. A discussion about the relevance of computational awareness to advanced simulation is also outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Complex SystemsSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207