MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114463311 · doi:10.5430/ijfr.v12n1p184

The Process of Management and Control of Feasibility Planning of Road Construction Using the Financial Information System

2020· article· en· W3114463311 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAerospace, Electronics, Mathematical Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKazan Federal University
KeywordsTask (project management)Computer scienceAutomationProcess (computing)Control (management)Process managementInformation systemBusiness processProduct (mathematics)Work (physics)SoftwareEngineering managementOperations managementBusinessWork in processSystems engineeringEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technical and economic planning control and effective organization of management processes in current situations are particularly significant. This is essential to automate orders and handle them effectively. Hence, the solution of tasks associated with planning, accounting, and distribution of orders is of great practical significance. The financial information system that operates at the enterprise does not allow sufficient automation of the enterprise's work and divisions. Analysis of the information system has revealed that automation of document flow and information flows of employees of the "planning and economic Department" is inadequate.Consequently, research objects are the business process - "Technical and economic planning" and the task "Distribution of orders by teams." The subsystem «Technical and economic planning» was produced, indicating the subsystem's tasks and the functions of the tasks. A connection diagram was composed of the tasks of this subsystem with the tasks of other subsystems. The task «Distribution of orders by teams» was expanded and implemented as a software product in the 1C programming environment. The chief issues of ensuring the information security of enterprises and the direction of forming a system of protection of information resources, particularly of limited access resources, are considered. The effectiveness of the implementation of the task “Distribution of orders by teams” were assessed: the annual economic effect of the implementation amounted to 2237, 03 rub.; the cost of developing a software product – 25715,40 rub.; discounted payback period is 11 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it