Penerapan Prinsip Pembangunan Berkelanjutan dan Ekonomi Berwawasan dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan dalam Rangka PSN Pasca Pengesahan Perpres 66/2020
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstrakPrinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan dan ekonomi berwawasan lingkungan merupakan amanat Pasal 33 ayat (4) UUD NRI 1945. Oleh karena itu, kedua amanat ini harus diterapkan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di bawahnya termasuk di sektor kehutanan dan perekonomian nasional. Pemerintah menilai percepatan pelaksanaan Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN) tidak hanya menumbuhkan perekonomian nasional, tetapi juga dapat menjaga kondisi ekonomi nasional selama pandemi COVID-19. Penilaian tersebut membuat pemerintah mengesahkan Perpres 66/2020 yang mengatur pendanaan pengadaan tanah dalam rangka pelaksanaan PSN, salah satunya di kawasan hutan. Peraturan pendanaan pengadaan tanah di kawasan hutan ini dikhawatirkan memberikan ancaman bagi penerapan pembangunan berkelanjutan dan ekonomi berwawasan lingkungan di sektor kehutanan. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini akan menganalisis apakah pembangunan berkelanjutan dan ekonomi berwawasan lingkungan di sektor kehutanan terancam dengan adanya peraturan ini.Kata kunci: Pembangunan berkelanjutan, ekonomi berwawasan lingkungan, Proyek Strategis Nasional, kawasan hutan. AbstractSustainable development and environmental perspective in economics are the mandates of The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945. Therefore, these two principles shall be implemented in the regulations beneath, including the forestry sector and national development. The government assumes that acceleration of the National Strategic Project (PSN) could not only increase the national economy growth, but also preserve it during the COVID-19 pandemic. That assumption made the government enact the Presidential Regulation No. 66 of 2020, which regulates land acquisition financing in PSN implementation, including in the forest areas. This land acquisition financing in the forest area regulation is expected to possess a threat to sustainable development and environmental perspective in economics implementation in forestry sector. Therefore, this article will analyse whether sustainable development and environmental perspective in economics are threatened with this regulation.Key words: Sustainable development, environmental economy perspective, National Strategic Project, forest area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".