Designing Security User Profiles via Anomaly Detection for User Authentication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability to detect the anomalous user behavior automatically and create user profiles, storing fresh and accurate security aspect user information, is important for systems administration, security, and development. This paper describes the best utilization of machine learning-based anomaly detection analysis, which is capable of distinguishing data that has security/identification potentials. Thereby, a novel technique for generating dynamic security user profiles is proposed. The real-time analytical outcomes of the anomaly detection methods are encapsulated into structured user profile records. These records store the sudden changing of the user's data, along with the real-time uniquely identifiable users' information. Each record is a unique entity describing a rear users' behavior, which have a substantial influence on user's identity verification. The verification process is in the form of user challenging questions generated from these stored records. The natural of the generated user profiles guarantee that these questions would be chosen such that the security and usability requirements are maintained. "Security" because each question is issued only once to protect the users' responses from being compromised. "Usability" because the data is fresh (real-time data) to help the legitimate user to easily remember and successfully complete the challenge. Real-world scenarios have been given showing the benefits of these challenging questions in building secure knowledge-based user authentication systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".