MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114556817 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.150818

Development of Sustainable Business Model: A Conceptual Framework for the Financial Sector to Obtain Successful ERP

2020· article· en· W3114556817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnterprise resource planningCritical success factorStructural equation modelingBusinessFinancial sectorProcess managementResource (disambiguation)Sustainable developmentKnowledge managementSustainable businessFinanceSustainabilityComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study identifies the key antecedent factors for accomplishing the adoption stage of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in their business operations. Four potential antecedent factors of adoption were derived from the literature, and data were obtained from a sample of 200 executives of the banking organizations of the financial sector across India. A structural equation modeling (SEM) technique was used to examine the complex relationships between antecedents and the adoption decision. The authors survey the literature to discover and classify critical success factors that are potentially applicable to financial sector. Four broad parameters namely, strategic, organizational, technological, and environmental (SOTE) has been identified for the efficacious development of ERP system in the financial sector of India. 11 dimensions has emerged as significant one for the financial sector. The results show that most of the success factors found in the literature apply to the industry. Nevertheless, distinct differences were found as well. Some factors, such as innovativeness of the implementation strategy, formulation of sound business plan, integration within the departments, adaptation capability of the system etc. would become the key instruments for successful implementation of ERP in the financial sector. The findings can help the executives of the financial sector to focus their attention, priorities, resources and leadership on managing the success factors that have been established to be critical for achieving ERP project implementation and ultimately, leading to the development of the sustainable business model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it