MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulation of intense heat-power effect of a gas environment for testing samples in a wide range of parameters

2020· article· en· W3114596273 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
С.В. Мосолов, I.S. Partola, A. S. Kudinov, I.I. Yurchenko, А. Г. Клименко, S. A. Fedorov

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Journal Science and Innovation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergetic Materials and Combustion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleJet (fluid)ThermocoupleMechanicsMaterials scienceCombustionWork (physics)Heat fluxCalibrationFlow (mathematics)Heat transferChemistryThermodynamicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of the work extend the available range of the parameters of gas acting on the samples of materials and coatings being tested under intense heat and power loads to study their properties and resource characteristics under stationary and pulsed exposure. A feature of the conditions proposed in this work for testing samples, distinguishing them from most common existing methods, is the simultaneous impact of a high temperature flux and high-pressure flow on the sample surface, the possibility of obtaining an oxidizing or reducing medium with different chemical compositions, as well as a pulsed cyclic effect on a material sample. The high performance of the experimental setup allows for up to 10 sample tests per day. To perform the research of the samples, a supersonic gas jet with nominal mode regimes was modeled. The jet was generated by gas dynamics facility through carbohydrate and oxygen mixture combustion and flow acceleration in Laval nozzle. Test sample can be positioned under various angles relative to the jet axis and on the desired distance from the nozzle edge. If necessary, the sample can be provided with measurement devices allowing measurements of temperature, heat flow and pressure. In order to provide a calibrated effect on the samples, the fields of jet parameters were studied using calibration plates provided with surface pressure sensors and thermocouples for determining heat fluxes. As a result, parameter fields of pressure, heat fluxes, pressure gradients, and friction stresses on the surface of samples were obtained depending on samples orientation and gas jet thermodynamic properties. Considering these field of parameters, tests can be performed to study the properties of materials. Metal and composite materials can be used as test samples as well as samples for testing the durability of coatings, multi-layer structures and protective fabric materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Journal Science and InnovationSame topicEnergetic Materials and CombustionFrench-language works237,207