A dual-level stochastic fleet size and mix problem for offshore wind farm maintenance operations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the strategic problem of finding a cost optimal fleet of vessels to support maintenance operations at offshore wind farms. A dual-level stochastic model is formulated, taking into account both long-term strategic uncertainty and short-term operational uncertainty in a single optimization model. The model supports wind farm owners in making strategic decisions regarding the number, placement, charter length, and types of vessels to charter, to meet maintenance demands throughout the lifetime of a wind farm. To evaluate the quality of strategic fleet size and mix decisions, the model also considers the operational decisions of how to utilize the fleet to support maintenance operations. The model accounts for strategic uncertainties that have not been considered in previously developed optimization models for offshore wind, such as uncertainty related to long-term trends in electricity prices and subsidy levels, the stepwise development of wind farms, and technology development in the vessel industry. To solve the proposed stochastic programming model we have developed an ad hoc integer L-shaped method, with customized optimality cuts. The computational experiments show that the proposed method outperforms solving the deterministic equivalent using a commercial MIP solver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".