MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114646669 · doi:10.32832/abdidos.v3i2.323

PENANGGULANGAN SAMPAH RUMAH TANGGA DAN POTENSI BAHAYA BANJIR DI LINGKUNGAN MASYARAKAT KAMPUNG CIASEUPAN DESA CIBITUNG KULON

2019· article· id· W3114646669 on OpenAlexaff
Muhamad Lutfi, A. R. Shehab Farhan, Nur Aisah Amini

Bibliographic record

VenueAbdi Dosen Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWaste Management and Recycling
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryPhysicsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sampah merupakan salah satu bentuk konsekuensi dari adanya aktifitas dan volumenya akansebanding lurus dengan jumlah penduduk. Apabila tidak di tangani secara efektif dan efisien,eksistensi sampah di alam tentu akan berbalik menghancurkan kehidupan di lingkungansekitarnya baik itu berupa bencana seperti banjir maupun munculnya berbagai penyakit yangdiakibatkan dari sampah tersebut. Perilaku yang tidak sehat berdampak pada perilakumasyarakat yang selalu membuang sampah sembarangan seperti di kali bahkan di paritsehingga timbunan sampah yang menumpuk di parit membuat terjadinya banjir ketika musim hujan. Kesadaran masyarakat terhadap sampah sangatlah berperan demi terciptanya lingkunganyang bersih dan sehat. Menyadarkan masyarakat terhadap perilaku membuang sampahsembarangan merupakan awal dari perubahan mewujudkan lingkungan yang bersih dan sehat.Sosialisasi tentang bahaya sampah menjadi sangat penting untuk membuka kesadaranmasyarakat untuk mengenalkan kepada masyarakat tentang dampak negatif maupun positifyang berhubungan dengan sampah sehingga masyarakat tidak lagi membuang sampahsembarangan dan masyarakat mampu untuk memanfaatkan sampah menjadi barang yangekonomis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbdi Dosen Jurnal Pengabdian Pada MasyarakatSame topicWaste Management and RecyclingFrench-language works237,207