MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114772427 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.608550

Empty Pericarp24 and Empty Pericarp25 Are Required for the Splicing of Mitochondrial Introns, Complex I Assembly, and Seed Development in Maize

2020· article· en· W3114772427 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhihui Xiu, Ling Peng, Yong Wang, Huanhuan Yang, Feng Sun, Xiaomin Wang, Shi‐Kai Cao, Ruicheng Jiang, Le Wang, Baoyin Chen, Bao‐Cai Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceInstitute of GeneticsNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaShimane UniversityChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsRNA splicingIntronBiologyGroup II intronGeneticsMitochondrial DNASplicing factorMutantPentatricopeptide repeatAlternative splicingRNAGeneExonRNA editing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RNA splicing is an essential post-transcriptional regulation in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. As the mechanism of RNA splicing remains obscure, identification and functional elucidation of new splicing factors are necessary. Through a characterization of two maize mutants, we clonedEmpty pericarp 24(Emp24) andEmpty pericarp 25(Emp25). BothEmp24andEmp25encode mitochondrion-targeted P-type PPR proteins. EMP24 is required for the splicing ofnad4introns 1 and 3, which was reported ( Ren Z. et al., 2019 ), and EMP25 functions in the splicing ofnad5introns 1, 2, and 3. Absence of either Nad4 or Nad5 proteins blocks the assembly of mitochondrial complex I, resulting in the formation of a sub-sized complex I of similar size in both mutants. Mass spectrometry identification revealed that the subcomplexes in both mutants lack an identical set of proteins of complex I. These results indicate that EMP24 and EMP25 function in the splicing ofnad4andnad5introns, respectively, and are essential to maize kernel development. The identification of the subcomplexes provides genetic and molecular insights into the modular complex I assembly pathway in maize.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Plant ScienceSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207