MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114813930 · doi:10.1115/detc2000/dac-14299

Structural Optimization Under Variable Loading Conditions

2000· article· en· W3114813930 on OpenAlexaff
Chin-Pun Teng, Jorge Angeles

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTopology Optimization in Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEllipseEigenvalues and eigenvectorsDiscretizationOrientation (vector space)Constant (computer programming)Stiffness matrixIsotropyMatrix (chemical analysis)Nonlinear programmingVariable (mathematics)StiffnessCentroidMathematicsNonlinear systemOptimization problemMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceGeometryStructural engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The problem of structural optimization under variable loading conditions is discussed here. We assume a linearly-elastic structure subject to one single load of constant magnitude but of arbitrary orientation. Moreover, we assume that the structure is discretized by finite elements. The result of this study is an optimality criterion: the eigenvalues of the stiffness matrix of the optimum structure observe a minimum variance. In other words, the optimum structure under variable load must have a stiffness matrix that is as close as possible to isotropy. Furthermore, in order to implement the foregoing criterion, we introduce a novel method of automatic mesh generation, that is based on the concept of penalty functions of nonlinear programming. Finally, we illustrate these concepts by means of the optimization of a triangular lamina of given side lengths, with an elliptical hole centered at its centroid, of a prescribed area, the design parameters being the semiaxes of the ellipse and the orientation of these axes with respect to the edges of the lamina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTopology Optimization in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207