Supporting the Transition From Hospital to Home for Older Adults: Case Study Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract It is often during transitions between health services that many issues arise for older adults, such as care that is poorly coordinated, additional burden placed on family and friend caregivers, and inappropriate placement in nursing homes. The Home Again program delivered by the provincial health authority in Nova Scotia, Canada, provides transitional care through providing additional support beyond what is normally provided through home care services to help older adults transition home after a hospital admission. The purpose of this research was to identify what factors contribute to older adults being placed unnecessarily in a nursing home when they could receive care through the Home Again program. Through using a retrospective multiple case study design, we analyzed interviews for five cases including older adult patients, their family or friend caregivers, and healthcare professionals in each case. Results indicate all hospitalized patients experienced a major health event or rapidly declining health. All family and friend caregivers experienced burnout and frustration from the lack of sufficient home care supports and quality of services available, such as services provided throughout the night. Healthcare professionals discussed that patients were placed on a waiting list for nursing homes due to lack of home care supports and resources for caregivers. This study contributes to our knowledge about better processes to ensure that hospitalized older adults are not unnecessarily admitted to nursing homes which can result in reduced healthcare costs and improved delivery and quality of care to older adults and their family and friend caregivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".