MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3114851133 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-02372349mtgabs

Study of Cathode Catalyst Layers for Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Using Fe-N-C Catalyst and a Novel Polymer Electrolyte

2020· article· en· W3114851133 on OpenAlexaff
Kanji Otsuji, Naoki Yokota, Donald A. Tryk, Katsuyoshi Kakinuma, Kenji Miyatake, Makoto Uchida

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsMD Precision (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteAnodeCatalysisCathodePlatinumProton exchange membrane fuel cellChemistryMaterials sciencePolymerMembrane electrode assemblyMethanolChemical engineeringElectrodeInorganic chemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we examined the cell performance of membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs), for anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs), using a non-noble metal catalyst and a novel polymer electrolyte. The chemical structure of quaternized poly(arylene perfluoroalkylene), i.e., QPAF-4 (ion exchange capacity: IEC = 2.1 meq g-1) developed in this laboratory1 is shown in Figure 1. Since this ionomer is soluble in lower alcohols such as methanol, it is also suitable for use as an electrode binder. The non-precious metal catalyst cell was loaded with 0.45 mg cm-2 Fe-N-C catalyst supplied by Pajarito Powder on the cathode and 0.45 mg cm-2 platinum catalyst on the anode, respectively. Pt loaded on carbon black (Pt/CB, TEC10E50E), supplied from TKK Japan, was used as the platinum electrocatalyst. Figure 2 shows the results of current-voltage (I-V) measurements of the cell using the Fe-N-C catalyst under back pressures from 0 to 100 kPag (same pressure on both sides) at 60 oC, 100% RH; anode H2 (100 mL min-1); cathode O2 (100 mL min-1). The cell using the Fe-N-C catalyst showed hysteresis in the I-V curves between increasing and decreasing current. The degree of hysteresis decreased with increasing the back pressure. Figure 3 shows the results obtained when the back pressure of the anode was 100 kPag and the back pressure of the cathode was varied. The hysteresis decreased as the cathode back pressure increased. At the present stage, the loading amount of Fe-N-C catalyst, ionomer content, and porosity of the catalyst layer have not yet been optimized. By increasing the back pressure, liquid water would be generated more easily which is advantageous since cathodic reaction in AEMFCs requires water. We found that supplying liquid water to the cathode lead to decrease of the hysteresis when using the QPAF-4 polymer and Fe-N-C catalyst as the cathode. Acknowledgements This project was partly supported by NEDO Japan through funds for the “Advanced Research Program for Energy and Environmental Technologies” and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under the Joint Research Projects (JRPs) program. Reference Ono, T. Kimura, A. Takano, K. Asazawa, J. Miyake, J. Inukai, K. Miyatake, J. Mater. Chem. A, 5, 24804 (2017). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→