Intervenciones sobre la lengua en la Argentina de finales de los 1920: Babel y el castellano (1928) de Arturo Capdevila, entre la prensa y el libro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo propone un recorrido por una obra particularmente influyente en la historia de los debates sobre la lengua en Argentina: Babel y el castellano (1928), de Arturo Capdevila, considerándola desde su gestación en las columnas publicadas por su autor en el periódico La Prensa de Buenos Aires a partir de 1925. El análisis atiende asimismo a la articulación que estas intervenciones, por parte de un escritor versátil aunque lego en materia de ciencias del lenguaje, encuentran en sus distintas manifestaciones con campos y discursos en proceso de consolidación y diferenciación en la época en el país, como el de la literatura y los estudios lingüísticos, así como a los ecos que estas hallan en desarrollos posteriores, especialmente en el campo de la lingüística profesional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".