MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3115041490

Formalising informal cross-border trade: Evidence from One-Stop-Border-Posts in Uganda

2020· preprint· en· W3115041490 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jade Siu

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExploitLanguage changeValue (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Point (geometry)BusinessInformal sectorBorder crossingInternational tradeTrade facilitationEconomicsTrade barrierDemographic economicsEconomic growthGeographyPolitical sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Informal trade is pervasive between sub-Saharan African countries. This study examines the extent to which the value of informal trade changes as a result from a change in the costs of trade. More specifically, I exploit time and custom point variation in the introduction of border facilities, aimed at reducing border delays and corruption. I find that the ratio of informal to total trade values between Uganda and its neighbours is reduced only in the quarter when the border facilities are introduced. By using an original data set collected at two border towns between Kenya and Uganda, I examine whether this result can be explained by formalisation of cross-border traders. I find that few traders formalise despite the reduced costs associated with trading formally, and that trade costs and border crossing choices are not only associated with export restrictions, but are also gendered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics→Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→