MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Non-Destructive Open Fault Isolation in Flip-Chip Devices with Space-Domain Reflectometry

2013· article· en· W3115183948 on OpenAlexaff
Wentao Qiu, M. S. Wei, Jan O. Gaudestad, Vladimir V. Talanov

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflectometryFault detection and isolationChipSquidElectronic engineeringFault (geology)Device under testTime domainComputer scienceMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringScattering parametersComputer visionGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Space-domain reflectometry (SDR) utilizing scanning superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) microscopy is a newly developed non-destructive failure analysis (FA) technique for open fault isolation. Unlike the conventional open fault isolation method, time-domain reflectometry (TDR), scanning SQUID SDR provides a truly two-dimensional physical image of device under test with spatial resolution down to 30 μm [1]. In this paper, the SQUID SDR technique is used to isolate dead open faults in flip-chip devices. The experimental results demonstrate the capability of SDR in open fault detection

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure AnalysisSame topicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure AnalysisFrench-language works237,207