MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GEWALT e uma Crítica Socioambiental

2020· article· pt· W3115298266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Opinião Filosófica · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAviation History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsCégep de l'Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesParanoiaSociologyPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partindo da conceituação das três ecologias propostas por Felix Guattari , como podemos e (se) devemos intervir para tornar ambientes, sujeitos e instituições mais aptos a viver no mundo contemporâneo, propiciando melhor bem-estar aos ambientes e aos membros da população. Só uma articulação ético-política – ECOSOFIA – entre os três registros ecológicos: do meio ambiente, das relações sociais e da subjetividade podem esclarecer as questões. Necessários novos dispositivos de produção de subjetividades individuais e coletivas. Égide ético-estética de uma ECOSOFIA. Gewalt. A violência e suas diferentes esferas de atuação. O poder , aquele aliado da liderança, e o poder que aliena e escraviza, vinculado à paranoia. Humano, que é humano? Desejo. Ação. Liberdade. Responsabilidade. Os estilos de vida, sua escolha no viver. A ação humana. O trabalho.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it