MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115335364 · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.12.015

A multi-center study on safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with kidney transplant

2020· article· en· W3115335364 on OpenAlexaff
Naoka Murakami, Patrick M. Mulvaney, Melissa Danesh, Ala Abudayyeh, Adi Diab, Noha Abdel‐Wahab, Maen Abdelrahim, Pascale Khairallah, Shayan Shirazian, Aleksandra Kukla, Itunu Owoyemi, Tarek Alhamad, Samir Husami, Madhav C. Menon, Andrew D. Santeusanio, Christopher D. Blosser, Sandra Carias Zuniga, María José Soler, Francesc Moreso, Zain Mithani, David I. Ortiz-Melo, Edgar A. Jaimes, Victoria Gutgarts, Erik L. Lum, Gabriel M. Danovitch, Francesca Cardarelli, Reed E. Drews, Claude Bassil, Jennifer Swank, Scott G. Westphal, Roslyn B. Mannon, Keisuke Shirai, Abhijat Kitchlu, Song Ong, Shana Machado, Suraj Sarvode Mothi, Patrick A. Ott, Osama E. Rahma, F. Stephen Hodi, Meghan E. Sise, Shruti Gupta, David E. Leaf, Craig Devoe, Rimda Wanchoo, Vinay Nair, Chrysalyne D. Schmults, Glenn J. Hanna, Ben Sprangers, Leonardo V. Riella, Kenar D. Jhaveri

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineKidney cancerKidney transplantImmune checkpointCancerOncologyKidney transplantationInternal medicineKidneyImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations181
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueKidney InternationalSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207