MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115397718 · doi:10.1017/9781780687520.010

Shale Gas Licensing in the United Kingdom

2018· book-chapter· en· W3115397718 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tina Hunter, Steven Latta

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersentia eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental law and policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleumGovernment (linguistics)Fossil fuelPermissionOil shaleEngineeringShale oilWork (physics)Petroleum engineeringBusinessWaste managementLawPolitical scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION In order to explore for or produce any form of petroleum, including shale gas, companies are required to gain permission. In the UK, this permission to access the petroleum is granted by the government on behalf of the Crown, and regulated by the relevant government department. There exists a diff erent petroleum access regime for onshore and off shore petroleum. This chapter will be concerned with the grant of an onshore UK petroleum licence, which is presently regulated and administered by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). The UK, in common with USA, Australia and Canada, has adopted a licensing system to regulate the exploration and production of oil and gas reserves. DECC acts under powers delegated to the Secretary of State for Energy through the Petroleum Act 1998 (the Act) to licence oil and gas production. This licensing system sets conditions for the grant of the licence. As companies seek to, in the first instance, explore for shale gas in the UK, there needs to be a fundamental understanding of the legal regime that grants the right to access and explore for shale gas. Fundamentally two (quite distinct) systems for petroleum (including shale gas) exploration in the UK exist. The first, and the topic of this chapter, is the licensing system, which grants a petroleum company a right to search for and extract petroleum. This is essentially an access system, which gives a company permission to look for petroleum, and without which the search for petroleum would be illegal. However, even when a petroleum company has been granted a licence, it does not gain an automatic right to commence drilling for petroleum. In order to drill, it is essential for the licence holder to gain the appropriate permissions from the regulators to undertake drilling and associated activities. This permissioning regime for petroleum activities is considered in the chapter on ‘Shale Gas Law and Regulation in the United Kingdom’ (pp. 281 ff .). This chapter will only consider how companies acquire access to petroleum resources owned by the state, through the grant of a licence. COMMON LAW AND STATUTORY RIGHTS TO OWNERSHIP OF MINERALS AND PETROLEUM Under the common law of England and Wales, all mines and minerals underneath the soil of a land are owned by the landowner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntersentia eBooksSame topicEnvironmental law and policyFrench-language works237,207