MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115443820 · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.4281

ESTIMATES OF SOCIAL MINIMUM BASKETS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2020

2020· article· en· W3115443820 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolityka Społeczna · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainable Development and Environmental Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicEconomicsBusinessDemographic economicsGeographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents estimates of social minimum baskets for the first quarter of 2020. During this period, in Poland as well as in other countries, a coronavirus pandemic broke out, which affected the functioning of households in various aspects. Nevertheless, available economic or social data on households’ environment can be considered beneficial. The presented values take into account the needs as foreseen in the model under normal conditions. The social minimum values increased from +2.8% for a single person of working age to +3.5% for two elderly people. The main factor of the increase were higher prices of food. The second growth factor were also higher fees for maintenance of housing and energy costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it