MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115450321 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-136268/v1

Herd immunity of Covid 19 in dynamic environments with vaccination: a model based study

2020· preprint· en· W3115450321 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liwei Yang, Bochuan Chen, Yu Zhang, Siyao Du, Lang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerd immunityCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)VaccinationHerd2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)ImmunityVirologyMedicineImmunologyImmune systemVeterinary medicineOutbreakInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BackgroundThe first wave of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Canada is entering the last stage, while the development of vaccine is still ongoing. A thorough analysis on the potential effect of restoring to the normal life was needed.MethodsWe used an infectious disease model which optimized for individual immunity to investigate the potential impact of the vaccine on the number of cases, ℛ𝑡, and the duration of the epidemic. We modeled the severity of the cases with three intervention measures and the effect of herd immunity. The combined intervention strategies with the vaccination, speed of vaccination, and the proportion of population pre-vaccinated before reopening were modeled to give an overview of the effect of the vaccination. For each simulation, we set the observation range to be from Feb, 2020 to Oct. 2021, and modeled the number of cases after the first wave, the change of reproduction number (ℛ𝑡), and the proportion of immunized population under the effect of waning immunity.FindingsWe found the proportion of immunized population to reach herd immunity in a dynamic environment to be between 1−1ℛ0and 1−1ℛ02; for Covid-19, the threshold proportion is 64·16%, the final proportion of infections could be up to 87·15% when basic reproduction number (ℛ0) is 2·79. The average number of cases predicted in Canada after the first wave was 285590, 90260, 163057, and 60082 with no intervention, social distancing, quarantining severe cases, and combined strategies; 122261, 89903, 49276, 39856, and 10983 cases with 0·1%, 0·2%, 0·3%, 0·4%, and 1·0% of the population vaccinated per day; 117475, 93502, 91634, 79418, and 8713 cases with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of population immunized before reopening. Assuming the half-life of the effectivity of the antibody is 48 weeks for symptomatic cases, 24 weeks for asymptomatic cases.Interpretation Neither of these strategies cannot prevent the second wave solely nor together. However, the third wave can be prevented with both social distancing and quarantining severe cases in practice. The speed and timing of vaccination has a direct impact on the reduction of the final number of cases. Unexpectedly, the proportion of population immunized before reopening did not lead to a huge shift of the number of cases after the first wave when the immunized proportion is lower than the critical proportion (49·6%) when social distancing is in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.038
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0380.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0010.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.500
GPT teacher head0.558
Teacher spread0.059 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207