MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electrochemical Method on the Optimum Cathodic Protection Potential of Grounding Grid in High Resistivity Soil

2020· article· en· W3115485218 on OpenAlexaff
Pengyi Liao, Yong Chang, Jun Yan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodic protectionGroundSoil resistivityCorrosionGridPolarization (electrochemistry)Materials scienceElectrical engineeringElectrochemistryElectrical resistivity and conductivityElectrical impedanceDielectric spectroscopyEngineeringComposite materialChemistryGeologyElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High resistivity soil may cause serious corrosion of substation grounding grid. The cathodic polarization curve and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of grounding grid metal at open circuit potential and different cathodic polarization potential were measured by electrochemical method. The method to determine the optimal cathodic protection potential (OCPP) of grounding grid in high resistivity soil was established. The result showed that the OCPP of Q235 steel was about -850 mV (vs. SCE), and the method was verified by immersion weight loss test. It is simple and feasible to use electrochemical method to study OCPP for cathodic protection of substation grounding grid, which is of great significance to prevent the corrosion of grounding grid, extend the service life of grounding grid and ensure the safe operation of grounding device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207