Rapid Whole Slide Imaging via Dual-Shot Deep Autofocusing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for digital pathology. The accuracy and speed of autofocusing are critical for the performance of the WSI system. This paper introduces a novel technique of deep autofocusing for WSI. Instead of mechanically adjusting the focal distance on a tile-by-tile basis, we develop a deep convolutional neural network for tile-wise autofocusing to generate in-focus images from tentative possibly defocused images. This deep autofocusing network (DAFNet) works with only two images taken at different focal distances; in contrast, traditional methods need to take, for each tile of the target ultra high-resolution pathology image, a stack of as many as 21 shots with varying focal distances. The novel architecture design of DAFNet facilitates the fusion of complementary information of the two input images of different focal distances. The proposed off-line reconstruction strategy allows high throughput scanning of sample slides done without compromising image quality, because DAFNet can rectify errors in focal distance and bring the scanned tiles back into focus by learnt non-linear dual-input blur-to-sharp mapping. Experimental results demonstrate the refocusing capability of the DAFNet method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it