Plotless Ballets on the Stage of Ukrainian Theaters (1960-1970s)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the peculiarities of staging plot-free ballets on the stages of Ukrainian theaters in the 1960s and 1970s on the example of performances by A. Shekera, O. Segal and I. Chernyshov. The semantic essence of the concept of "plotless ballet" is specified and the process of formation of this type of ballet performances in historical retrospect is traced. The specifics of plotless ballets as a unique type of performance in the Ukrainian ballet theater of the 60-70s of the XX century are characterized. and the contribution of choreographers to the development of artistic and figurative forms of ballet art of Ukraine is determined. It is revealed that in the works of the leading Ukrainian choreographers of the mentioned period the author's comprehension of the plastic-intonational content in the dialogue of music and choreography was embodied in many ways. The main choreographers of Ukrainian opera and ballet theaters, representing productions in which choreography is raised to the highest level of poetic generalization, helped to expand the horizons of Ukrainian choreography, to determine the main directions of national ballet in the second half of the twentieth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".