Delayed Hospital Discharge–The Effect of Dementia and GP Contacts Prior to Hospitalization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Delayed hospital discharge, also known as alternate level of care (ALC) in Canada, refers to a stay in hospital when acute services are no longer needed but the patient occupies a hospital bed while waiting to be discharged to an appropriate care setting. ALC has negative consequences for both the service system (high costs, inappropriate use of hospital resources) and individuals (feelings of uncertainty, functional loss). Extensive administrative health care data from British Columbia, Canada, were employed to study differences in ALC between people with and without dementia in 2001/02, 2005/06, 2010/11 and 2015/16, and whether continuity in physician–patient relationships prior to hospitalization is associated with ALC. We analyzed designation of ALC and length of stay in ALC, using generalized estimating equations logistic regression and negative binomial regression analysis. Of all individual, residential area and health care related factors, dementia was the single most important factor increasing the odds of designation of ALC (OR 4.76, 95%CI 4.59, 4.93). Dementia also added to the length of stay in ALC. Proportion of patients designated to ALC increased over the study years. Higher number of visits to the same general practitioner (GP) prior to hospitalization decreased the odds of ALC, especially in people with dementia. As populations age, the number of people with dementia is increasing. Efforts to control ALC have resulted in greater concentration of ALC among people with dementia. Higher continuity GP care may be a way to help understand and control these trends.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".