The introduction of the agricultural technologies by the occupation authorities in the Kherson region in 1941–1944
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the rich cultural and social life of the Lemkos in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Winnipeg, Montreal, Toronto, and others.Along with the articles about the life of Lemkos in the North American countries, quite a few Lemko newspapers wrote about the cultural life of Lemko communities in South American countries, such as Brazil, Peru and Paraguay.The newspapers published columns «To the Lemko Brothers from Uruguay» and «Ukrainians in Argentina» that provide information about the cultural achievements of the Lemkos in these countries.The newspapers published articles about the life of Ruthenians in France, Germany, Britain, Czechoslovakia, Lithuania, and Yugoslavia as well.They inform about various cultural and educational events and considerable achievements of Lemko emigration in these countries.Finally, there were a few publications from Manchuria (Green Wedge) that give an idea of the scale of Lemko's emigration.Conclusions.The study suggests that the cultural and educational movement of Lemko emigrants was extremely active, especially given the modest financial resources of the migrants, who mostly worked in the least prestigious and therefore low-paid jobs.The diversity of Ruthenian cultural life is also striking, it includes various projects such as creation of educational institutions, establishment of museums and Sunday schools, organisation of folklore festivals, publication of periodicals and implementation of translation projects.As a result, this work, mostly conducted in the spirit of unity, became an important and organic component of the cultural life of foreign Ukrainians in the interwar period.This allowed to preserve Lemko cultural diversity and ethnic identity and pass them on to the post-war generation of Ruthenians, who were deprived of the right to live on their native land by totalitarian regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".