MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The introduction of the agricultural technologies by the occupation authorities in the Kherson region in 1941–1944

2020· article· en· W3115627180 on OpenAlex
G. Tsybulenko, L. Tsybulenko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCherkasy University Bulletin Historical Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgriculturePolitical scienceBusinessGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

the rich cultural and social life of the Lemkos in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Winnipeg, Montreal, Toronto, and others. Along with the articles about the life of Lemkos in the North American countries, quite a few Lemko newspapers wrote about the cultural life of Lemko communities in South American countries, such as Brazil, Peru and Paraguay. The newspapers published columns To the Lemko Brothers from Uruguay and Ukrainians in Argentina that provide information about the cultural achievements of the Lemkos in these countries. The newspapers published articles about the life of Ruthenians in France, Germany, Britain, Czechoslovakia, Lithuania, and Yugoslavia as well. They inform about various cultural and educational events and considerable achievements of Lemko emigration in these countries. Finally, there were a few publications from Manchuria (Green Wedge) that give an idea of the scale of Lemko's emigration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it