“Todos os textos de canones”: is any of the books of the medieval Portuguese studium library still extant?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Em 8 de Junho de 1536, Nicolau Lopes, o último bedel da universidade medieval de Lisboa, compilou um inventário que incluía todos os 156 livros da biblioteca da universidade portuguesa, poucos meses antes da deslocalização definitiva do studium generale para Coimbra, em Março de 1537. Esse inventário acabou por se tornar um documento precioso, pois permite-nos compreender a circulação de saberes, pessoas e livros na Europa na Idade Média e início do período moderno. Com base nos inventários originais da biblioteca do estudo e nos catálogos existentes de manuscritos e incunábulos da Biblioteca Geral da Universidade de Coimbra (que presentemente detém os arquivos da velha universidade medieval sediada em Lisboa), propomo-nos neste artigo a tentar compreender se algum dos volumes mencionados no inventário sobreviveu até hoje, ao mesmo tempo que tentamos identificar adequadamente alguns dos livros descritos no inventário.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".