MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Review of Recent Neural Network Approaches to the Modeling of Nonlinear Microwave Devices

2020· review· en· W3115714286 on OpenAlexaff
Wenyuan Liu, Weicong Na, Wei Zhang, Lin Zhu, Mingwei Wang

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 13th UK-Europe-China Workshop on Millimetre-Waves and Terahertz Technologies (UCMMT) · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersBeijing Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArtificial neural networkNonlinear systemComputer scienceMicrowaveElectronic engineeringSIGNAL (programming language)Control engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear microwave device modeling is an important part of computer-aided design (CAD) and many papers have been published in the literature. This paper presents a review of recent neural network approaches to the modeling of nonlinear microwave device including the dynamic Neuro-SM approach and the Wiener-type dynamic neural network approach and its applications. DC, small-signal and large-signal harmonic data are used as training data. The neural network based methods can fast and accurately build accurate models for nonlinear microwave devices. Compared with conventional equivalent circuit models, the models generated by these neural network based methods are more efficient to represent the behavior of the device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 13th UK-Europe-China Workshop on Millimetre-Waves and Terahertz Technologies (UCMMT)Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207