MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3115715635 · doi:10.22067/econg.v10i2.61971

مطالعه کانی سازی، میان بارهای سیال و شرایط رخداد کانسارهای فلوریت باقر آباد و دره بادام، جنوب شرق محلات

2019· article· fa· W3115715635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
سید جواد مقدسی, ابراهیم طالع فاضل, عالیه سادات بنی فاطمی

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefa
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Fluorite ore deposits are classified into three main groups: (1) magmatic deposits, (2) structures related deposits, and (3) sedimentary deposits (Dill, 2010). More than 30 fluorite occurrences with approximately 1.35 million tons of reserves have been recognized in Iran (Miller, 2014). Bagher Abad and Darreh Badam fluorite ore deposits, located in the southeast of Delijan (Markazi province) occur between the central Iran structural zone from the north and the Sanandaj-Sirjan structural zone from the south. The geology of the area is dominated by folded and faulted structures of Jurassic carbonates and shales (Thiele et al., 1968). The main host rocks for fluorite mineralization in the studied area are the Lower-Upper Jurassic carbonates and shales of Shemshak and Badamu Formations. Materials and Methods In this study, 70 samples from the various rock types including fluorite veins, host rocks and related alterations were collected. 25 thin- and polished thin-sections were prepared and studied to explain the mineralogy and paragenetic sequence of the ore body. Eight double-polished sections were also prepared for micro-thermometric analysis. The micro-thermometric analyses were conducted on primary fluid inclusions using Linkam THM600 heating-freezing stage connected to a TMS94 temperature controller and a liquid nitrogen pump (LNP) cooling system. Results The main host rocks for fluorite mineralization in the studied area are composed of the lower Jurassic slate and phyllite (Shemshak Formation) and the Middle to Upper Jurassic dolomitic limestone and calcareous sandstone (Badamu Formation). The main alterations associated with fluorite mineralization are sericitization, silicification and argillization. According to the fluid inclusions data, fluorite mineralization in Bagher Abad and Darreh Badam deposits were precipitated because of pressure reduction of ore bearing fluids and mixing of a primary moderate-salinity brine with less saline meteoric water. Estimation of trapping pressure-temperature of the mineralizing fluid in Bagher Abad fluorite deposit using the intersecting CO2 and H2O isochors for aqueous, aqueous-carbonic and carbonic fluid inclusions indicated that fluorite mineralization occurred at 180-260°C and 1-2 kbar pressure. According to the present study, circulation and upward flow of hydrothermal fluids (containing H2O and CO2) that originated from underlying altered bedrock provided appropriate conditions for increasing the solubility of metals and formation of halide (Cl¯ and F¯) metal complexes. Reaction with wallrock and gradual decrease in temperature due to mixing and dilution of the above-mentioned fluids with low-salinity meteoric water resulted in fluorite mineralization in favorable structures such as veins. Discussion Bagher Abad and Darreh Badam fluorite ore deposits are examples of epigenetic mineralizations which are not related to igneous activities in Iran. The mineralization is formed in nearly vertical veins, which are relevant to local fractures hosted in the Lower-Upper Jurassic carbonates and shales with east-west trend. The main ore textures are open-space fillings, breccias, veins and cavities associated with sericitic, silicic and argillic alterations. Micro-thermometric measurements were carried out on primary fluid inclusions in fluorite, calcite and barite minerals from both Bagher Abad and Darreh Badam deposits. Three types of fluid inclusions were distinguished: (1) two phase aqueous fluid inclusions (LV), (2) liquid (L) or vapor (V) mono phase inclusions, and (3) aqueous-carbonic (L1+L2+V) fluid inclusions. The first ice melting temperatures (Te) of two phase aqueous inclusions (LV) in fluorite, calcite and barite from Bagher Abad and Darreh Badam deposits vary between -32 to -15°C and -35 to -24°C, respectively, which represents a H2O+NaCl±KCl multiphase fluid (Van den Kerkhof and Hein, 2001). The last ice melting temperatures (Tmice) vary between -10.5 to -2.3°C and -12.0 to -5.6°C which are equal to salinities of 5.6-14.7 and 8.3-15.2 wt% NaCl equivalent for Bagher Abad and Darreh Badam deposits, respectively. The final homogenization temperatures (Thtotal) vary between 127 to 188 °C and 176 to 270°C for Bagher Abad and Darreh Badam deposits, respectively. The CO2 melting temperatures (TmCO2) of aqueous-carbonic inclusions in fluorite, calcite and barite show a range of -58.3 to -56.6°C which suggests CH4 and/or N2 impurities (Burruss, 1981). The clathrate melting temperatures (Tmclath) ranging from -6.0 to +1.0°C represent salinities between 5.5 to 18.2 wt% NaCl equivalent for both Bagher Abad and Darreh Badam fluorite deposits. References Burruss, R.C., 1981. Analysis of phase equilibria in C–O–H–S fluid inclusions. In: L.S. Hollister and M.L. Crawford (Editors), Fluid inclusions: applications to petrology. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, Ontario, pp. 39–74. Dill, H.G., 2010. The chessboard classification scheme of mineral deposits: mineralogy and geology from aluminum to zirconium. Earth-Science Reviews, 100(1): 1–420. Miller, M.M., 2014. Fluorspar. In: S.M. Kimball (Editor), Mineral commodity summaries 2014. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, pp. 56–57. Thiele, O., Alavi, M., Assefi, R., Hushmand-zadeh, A., Seyed-Emami, K. and Zahedi, M., 1968. Explanatory text of the Golpaygan quadrangle map, scale 1:250,000. Geological Survey of Iran, Geological quadrangle E7, Tehran, 24 pp. Van den Kerkhof, A.M. and Hein, U.F., 2001. Fluid inclusion petrography. Lithos, 55(1–4): 27–47.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→