MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115723390 · doi:10.3390/s21010113

Transfer of Learning from Vision to Touch: A Hybrid Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Visuo-Tactile 3D Object Recognition

2020· article· en· W3115723390 on OpenAlexafffund
Ghazal Rouhafzay, Ana-Maria Creţu, Pierre Payeur

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTransfer of learningDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)Tactile sensorCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionComputer visionObject (grammar)Robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transfer of learning or leveraging a pre-trained network and fine-tuning it to perform new tasks has been successfully applied in a variety of machine intelligence fields, including computer vision, natural language processing and audio/speech recognition. Drawing inspiration from neuroscience research that suggests that both visual and tactile stimuli rouse similar neural networks in the human brain, in this work, we explore the idea of transferring learning from vision to touch in the context of 3D object recognition. In particular, deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) pre-trained on visual images are adapted and evaluated for the classification of tactile data sets. To do so, we ran experiments with five different pre-trained CNN architectures and on five different datasets acquired with different technologies of tactile sensors including BathTip, Gelsight, force-sensing resistor (FSR) array, a high-resolution virtual FSR sensor, and tactile sensors on the Barrett robotic hand. The results obtained confirm the transferability of learning from vision to touch to interpret 3D models. Due to its higher resolution, tactile data from optical tactile sensors was demonstrated to achieve higher classification rates based on visual features compared to other technologies relying on pressure measurements. Further analysis of the weight updates in the convolutional layer is performed to measure the similarity between visual and tactile features for each technology of tactile sensing. Comparing the weight updates in different convolutional layers suggests that by updating a few convolutional layers of a pre-trained CNN on visual data, it can be efficiently used to classify tactile data. Accordingly, we propose a hybrid architecture performing both visual and tactile 3D object recognition with a MobileNetV2 backbone. MobileNetV2 is chosen due to its smaller size and thus its capability to be implemented on mobile devices, such that the network can classify both visual and tactile data. An accuracy of 100% for visual and 77.63% for tactile data are achieved by the proposed architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207