MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115734173 · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiaa206

Temporal and spatial interactions modulate the soybean microbiome

2020· article· en· W3115734173 on OpenAlexaff
Itumeleng Moroenyane, Julien Tremblay, Étienne Yergeau

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Ecology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRhizosphereMicrobiomeEcological nicheEcologyBiodiversityEcosystemNiche differentiationAlpha diversityAbundance (ecology)NicheBeta diversityRelative species abundanceTemporal scalesCommunity structureHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Managed agricultural ecosystems are unique systems where crops and microbes are intrinsically linked. This study focuses on discerning microbiome successional patterns across all plant organs and tests for evidence of niche differentiation along temporal and spatial axes. Soybean plants were grown in an environmental chamber till seed maturation. Samples from various developmental stages (emergence, growth, flowering and maturation) and compartments (leaf, stem, root and rhizosphere) were collected. Community structure and composition were assessed with 16S rRNA gene and ITS region amplicon sequencing. Overall, the interaction between spatial and temporal dynamics modulated alpha and beta diversity patterns. Time lag analysis on measured diversity indices highlighted a strong temporal dependence of communities. Spatial and temporal interactions influenced the relative abundance of the most abundant genera, whilst random forest predictions reinforced the observed localisation patterns of abundant genera. Overall, our results show that spatial and temporal interactions tend to maintain high levels of biodiversity within the bacterial/archaeal community, whilst in fungal communities OTUs within the same genus tend to have overlapping niches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology EcologySame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207