Entering Flatland in One Piece: Growth and Electronic Transport Measurements of Single Crystal Two-Dimensional Conductive MOFs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVFirst ReactionsNEXTEntering Flatland in One Piece: Growth and Electronic Transport Measurements of Single Crystal Two-Dimensional Conductive MOFsCharacterizing intrinsic electronic transport in planar single crystals of two-dimensional conductive metal−organic frameworks.Madeline Van WinkleMadeline Van WinkleDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United StatesMore by Madeline Van Winkle and D. Kwabena BediakoD. Kwabena BediakoDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United StatesChemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United StatesAzrieli Global Scholar, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), Toronto, Ontario M5G 1M1, CanadaE-mail: [email protected]More by D. Kwabena Bediakohttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0064-9814Cite this: ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 1, 14–16Publication Date (Web):December 18, 2020Publication History Published online18 December 2020Published inissue 27 January 2021https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c01625Copyright © Published 2020 by American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSACS AuthorChoiceArticle Views1752Altmetric-Citations1LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (1 MB) Get e-AlertsSUBJECTS:Crystallization,Crystal structure,Two dimensional materials,Charge transport,Electrical conductivity Get e-Alerts
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".