MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115813202

Meta Analysis: Effect of Oral Contraceptives on Obesity in Fertile Age Women in Asia

2020· article· en· W3115813202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Zia Ulhaq, Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari, Bhisma Murti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Maternal and Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOverweightObservational studyPopulationObesityDemographyOdds ratioGynecologyEnvironmental healthInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Obesity is a disease with a com­plex (multi-causal) cause because it involves genetic and environmental factors. Some of them are heredity, individual socio-economic factors, eating patterns (habits), food con­sump­tion, physical activity, hormonal, nutri­tional knowledge, and perception. This study aimed to analyze the effect of oral contraceptives on obesity in women of childbearing age. Subjects and Method: This was a meta ana­lysis and systematic review from several obser­vational studies. The articles were collected from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Springer­link databases, published from 2000-2020. Data collection used eligibility criteria, inclu­ding population (P): women of reproductive age, intervention (I): oral contraceptive, com­parison (C): non oral contraceptive, and out­come (O): obesity. Keywords used “pil contra­ception” OR “Pil Contraceptive” AND “Oral Contraceptive” OR “Oral Contraception” AND “Obesity” OR “Overweight” AND“ Cross sectio­nal” AND “Cohort” AND “Adjusted Odds Ratio”. Selected articles were full text of obser­vational study. These articles were selected by PRISMA flow diagram. Quantitative synthesis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 program. Results: A total of 3 articles reviewed in a meta-analysis with subgroup analysis using an observational cohort design showed that oral contraceptives increased the risk of obesity in women of reproductive age (aOR= 1.14, 95% CI= 1.03-1.26, p<0.001). A meta-analysis of 4 articles that conducted a subgroup analysis with a cross sectional observational design also showed that oral contraceptives increased the risk of obesity in women of childbearing age (aOR= 1.52; 95% CI= 0.78-298; p <0.001). This meta-analysis combines primary research from Korea, India, Canada, Congo, and the United States of America. Conclusion: Oral contraceptives increase the risk of obesity. Keywords: oral contraception, obesity Correspondence:  Muhammad Zia Ulhaq. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: kandaulhaq@gmail.com. Journal of Maternal and Child Health (2020), 05(06): 673-682 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejmch.2020.05.06.07.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Maternal and Child HealthSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207