Transformer l’exposé oral classiqueen exposé oral enregistré au primaire :quelles modalités de travail de l’enseignant etquels effets pour les élèves ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transformer l'expos oral classique en expos oral enregistr au primaire : quelles modalits de travail de l'enseignant et quels effets pour les lves ? Formation et profession 28(4 hors-srie), 2020 sum Dans le contexte de la pandmie, les enseignants ont t amens, de manire rapide et, souvent, sans formation, utiliser les outils numriques pour pouvoir garder le contact avec leurs lves. Nous avons explor cette situation relativement l' enseignement de l' oral au primaire en suivant un enseignant du primaire et ses lves de 10-11 ans dans le cadre de l' expos oral. Les deux entretiens raliss auprs de l' enseignant et les deux questionnaires soumis aux lves ont permis de mettre en vidence les avantages et les limites du dispositif hybride propos : l' expos oral enregistr, distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it