MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3115910700 · doi:10.1111/medu.14448

Visualisation technologies—I can see clearly now but the feel is gone

2021· letter· en· W3115910700 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy D. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Education · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Haptic technology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakRepresentation (politics)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VisualizationVirtual realityPsychologyComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionMedicineArtificial intelligencePathologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given Bogomolova et al.'s demonstration that 3D virtual representation of anatomy helps learning, Wilson questions where such findings could take us in a COVID‐moderated 21st century without haptics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical EducationSame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207