MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116000608

Simulation and rendering for millions of grass blades.

2015· article· es· W3116000608 on OpenAlexaff
Zengzhi Fan, Hongwei Li, Karl Hillesland, Bin Sheng

Bibliographic record

VenueDidáctica Lengua y Literatura · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShaderComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceAnimationRendering (computer graphics)OpenGLVertex (graph theory)Frame rateComputer animationComputational scienceSimulationArtificial intelligenceVisualizationGraphTheoretical computer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide detailed simulated response for individual blades of grass in fields of millions of blades. The field is divided into tiles whose blade data are instanced from a small patch of blades on the GPU to limit memory and bandwidth requirements. We only instantiate simulation state and compute simulation for tiles interacting with objects. The simulation does not stop immediately when objects leave the tile but with a smooth transition to the original GPU-instanced state. Grass motion is solved with collision, length, bending and twisting constraints. Global animation from wind is still handled through conventional, procedural methods in the vertex shader. Our method is also compatible with a rendering level-of-detail (LOD) system. With 128 objects moving in a field with over a million blades of grass, the frame rate is less than 20 ms, with only a few milliseconds of that time for simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDidáctica Lengua y LiteraturaSame topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207