MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116037786 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.102007

Genome-wide analysis of DNA uptake across the outer membrane of naturally competent Haemophilus influenzae

2020· article· en· W3116037786 on OpenAlexafffund
Marcelo Mora, Joshua Chang Mell, Garth D. Ehrlich, Rachel Ehrlich, Rosemary J. Redfield

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHaemophilus influenzaeDNAGenomePasteurellaceaeBiologygenomic DNADNA sequencingPhase variationGeneticsGeneBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genomes of naturally competent Pasteurellaceae and Neisseriaceae have many short uptake sequences (USS), which allow them to distinguish self-DNA from foreign DNA. To fully characterize this preference we developed genome-wide maps of DNA uptake using both a sequence-based computational model and genomic DNA that had been sequenced after uptake by and recovery from competent Haemophilus influenzae cells. When DNA fragments were shorter than the average USS spacing of ∼1,000 bp, sharp peaks of uptake were centered at USS and separated by valleys with 1000-fold lower uptake. Long DNA fragments (1.5–17 kb) gave much less variation, with 90% of positions having uptake within 2-fold of the mean. All detectable uptake biases arose from sequences that fit the USS uptake motif. Simulated competition predicted that, in its respiratory tract environment, H. influenzae will efficiently take up its own DNA even when human DNA is present in 100-fold excess.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207