MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Design and Construction of a Full-Width, Full-Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slab on Steel Girder Bridge

2005· article· en· W31160420 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Harrison, N. David LeBlanc

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteGirderDeckStructural engineeringSlabPrestressed concreteCrackingCreepDurabilitySpan (engineering)Expansion jointGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringBridge (graph theory)Shear (geology)Materials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The West Sandusky Street Bridge over I-75 in Findlay, Ohio, consisted of a single 170-ft-span hybrid steel plate girder bridge with a concrete deck. To minimize closure times on West Sandusky Street and reduce traffic delays on I-75 during the bridge's replacement, full-width, full-depth precast concrete deck panels were proposed for the bridge deck construction. The precast deck panels are posttensioned both longitudinally and transversely to minimize cracking and improve durability and are constructed with shear stud pockets to allow for the installation of shear studs after erection and posttensioning. During detail design, a finite element analysis of the bridge deck was carried out to determine the required level of prestress in the deck. A time-dependent analysis was subsequently completed to determine the long-term creep effects and posttensioning losses, including the effects of restraint from the steel girders. A sensitivity analysis determined the optimum curing time required before stressing the longitudinal posttensioning tendons and grouting the shear pockets. The steel plate girders were designed for the long-term creep effects due to the posttensioning of the deck, which imposed additional axial loads and moments on the steel girders. The replacement deck panels were fabricated before bridge demolition and road closure. Bridge construction was completed in fall 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board→Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete→French-language works237,207→